Law enforcement dating
M.’s behalf, an internal complaint regarding the abuse was made anonymously.
According to Casini, no SART team was mobilized and “the whole process was punitive against her and disgusting to witness.” During last year’s tour, an ICE official named Jacob Castro told the groups that when there is criminal prosecution for sexual assault, Williamson County “will take over.” The public information officer with Williamson County Sheriff’s Office did not respond to repeated requests for comment regarding whether or not an official investigation into L.In a bid to end a class-action lawsuit against the city, Philadelphia officials are seeking a federal judge’s approval of a voluntary permanent ban on the controversial use of civil-forfeiture proceeds to fund police and prosecutors.With one exception, the city has voluntarily stopped using property seized in criminal cases to fund the District Attorney’s Office and the Police Department. Robreno to approve a permanent injunction on Philadelphia’s using the proceeds for law enforcement, arguing that it would satisfy a stated demand by the plaintiffs for such prohibition.Advocates are calling for the sheriff’s office to launch an official investigation into the allegations. “As for myself, a woman named [redacted], harassed me, telling me threatening words and forcing me to have unwanted relations with her, which I did not want, but I had to do what she wanted,” L. “She began to tell me she liked me, and that whatever she liked belonged to her, and every time, her words became more absurd as she told me that she loved me and that she wasn’t going to let anyone humiliate her given that I didn’t want a relationship.” that L. did not initially tell anyone of her abuse, though it was witnessed by another guard who no longer works at the facility. had an open asylum case and was afraid that filing a complaint would have a negative impact on her immigration case. reached out to Core Civic for comment regarding the current employment status of L. lost her asylum case, she confided in a Grassroots Leadership visitation volunteer that she was being abused.In a letter detailing her experience at Hutto, shared with Grassroots Leadership, L. explains that a woman she knew in Hutto was transferred to another facility after making her abuse known to officials. It is unknown if the guard who witnessed the abuse was fired or if she quit. M.’s alleged abuser, but the company did not respond to request for comment. Casini told that before the volunteer could act on L.“By agreeing to discontinue the expenditure of forfeiture proceeds on law enforcement needs in the District Attorney’s Office and Police Department — even though that is permitted by statute — we eliminate once and for all any concern of improper motives for forfeiture,” Martin said.
Lawyers at the Institute for Justice, the Virginia-based nonprofit that filed the suit in 2014 on behalf of plaintiffs in Philadelphia, could not be reached for comment Friday night.
That information showed that the OIG received at least 1,016 reports of sexual abuse, which were filed by people in detention, between May 2014 and July 2016.
This means there was more than one complaint of sexual abuse made by people in detention each day.
M.’s abuse and no longer works at the facility, though there is no way to confirm that. She was not provided with legal counsel by either ICE or Core Civic, according to Casini, and was even asked by detention officers if she “needed time in medical solitary to think about what she wanted to say.” Weeks prior, L. says she was held in medical solitary for 24 hours and, fearing similar treatment, she opted to provide a written description without the presence of an attorney.
Because of the internal complaint, Hutto launched an investigation into the allegations and asked L. Grassroots Leaderships is now working in a greater capacity with L.
Of these 1,016 reports of sexual abuse, the OIG investigated only 24.