They later claimed that Merritte was neurologically impaired, which if true would only add to the unethical nature of the original research. In particular, this cast doubt on so-called “recovered memories” of abuse that originated during sessions of psychotherapy. For instance, in one of his experiments, he found that people performed better at a memory task for words they revised in the future.
For example, in 2012 Joshua Carp wrote a paper claiming that most imaging papers fail to provide enough methodological detail to allow others to attempt replications. Perspectives on psychological science, 4(3), 274-290. In 2008 Irving Kirsch, a psychologist who was then based at the University of Hull in the UK, analysed all the trial data on anti-depressants, published and unpublished, submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration. The implicit assumption, of course, is that parents play a profound role in shaping their offspring. Your decisions feel like your own, but Benjamin Libet’s study using electroencephalography (EEG) appeared to show that preparatory brain activity precedes your conscious decisions of when to move.Over the last few years, controversy has also developed around the identity of poor Little Albert. The false childhood event is simply described to a participant alongside true events, and over a few interviews it soon becomes absorbed into the person’s true memories, so that they think the experience really happened.In 2009, a team led by Hall Beck claimed that the baby was in fact Douglas Merritte. The research and other related findings became hugely controversial because they showed how unreliable and suggestible memory can be. In 2010 social psychologist Daryl Bem attracted huge attention when he claimed to have shown that many established psychological phenomena work backwards in time.Christian Jarrett Controversy is essential to scientific progress.As Richard Feynman said, “science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.” Nothing is taken on faith, all assumptions are open to further scrutiny.It’s also notable that many participants in fact disobeyed instructions, and in such cases, verbal prompts from the scientist were largely ineffective. This finding is just one of many in the field of “social priming” research, all of which suggest our minds are far more open to influence than we realise.
In 2012, a different lab tried to replicate the elderly words study and failed. Ever since, the controversy over his study and other related findings has only intensified. Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action.
This situationist interpretation has been challenged, most forcibly by the British psychologists Steve Reicher and Alex Haslam. Stanley Milgram’s studies conducted in the 1960s appeared to show that many people are incredibly obedient to authority.
The pair argue, on the basis of their own BBC Prison study and real-life instances of prisoner resistance, that people do not yield mindlessly to toxic environments. Given the instruction from a scientist, many participants applied what they thought were deadly levels of electricity to an innocent person.
Here we digest ten of the most controversial studies in psychology’s history.
Please use the comments to have your say on these controversies, or to highlight provocative studies that you think should have made it onto our list.
Cartoon aficionados will understand why this memory was definitely false. Further controversy came from the the fact that the journal that published Bem’s results refused at first to publish any replication attempts. Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect.