Assumptions behind radiometric dating
Chinese appear to have been among those who were mapping the world at that time - a mapping project which included North and South America as well as Antarctica - and some of whose maps were later copied by Piri Reis. But this does not explain the other 99% of sophisticated technology found in the ruins of ancient civilizations.
Much of what you describe of ancient technology as from some 'mysterious' race is actually from ancient Chinese sailors. Evidence suggests that the major factor was a sudden climate change (this would require a lengthy explanation which is a topic for the future) - being an aftermath of the Flood. or is this most likely the result of the earth shift during the flood? All of the desert regions you mentioned appear to have had, at one time, contained advanced civilizations involved in a nuclear war.Were you aware that Captain Cook in his voyage of discovery along the East coast of Australia had pre-existing maps.However, their maps were cruder than the older ones. Although there is positive evidence of other Australian items landing up in the Middle east, I still have not tracked down the hard evidence for Gympie gold. Would love to get a sample from the tomb: You are right, Barry. Traditionally, metallic objects found underground are dated by the presumed age of the strata in which they are found.
These objects were thus dated at thousands of years.
- Adam inquisitive librarian, I read much of interest.
The evolutionists I debate with always resort back to that method, as they say it can date back millions of years.
read that they were declared to be thousands of years old. I'm guessing carbon-dating, however I am really interested to see if any radiometric dating was done on it.
Man-made "help" through nuclear conflict could have played a secondary role a little later.
(b) then rapid glaciation due to continuing volcanism bringing rain which could not re-evaporate due to the blocking of the sun's rays - accompanied by freezing at ground level.