Grave abuse of discretion implies such capricious and whimsical exercise of judgment as is equivalent to lack of jurisdiction, or, in other words where the power is exercised in an arbitrary or despotic manner by reason of passion or personal hostility, and it must be so patent and gross as to amount to an evasion of positive duty or to a virtual refusal to perform the duty enjoined or to act at all in contemplation of law. The Court sees no abuse, much less grave abuse of discretion, committed in this case.
Barrios; and State Prosecutors (SPs) Richard Anthony D. Agcaoili, for alleged violation of Article 171(5)Resolution dated September 18, 1997, issued by Graft Investigation Officer II Roline M. With regard to the charge of falsification against respondents Barrios, Fadullon and Agcaoili, again, we agree with the observations of Graft Investigation Officer II Roline M.Pursuant to Article VIII, Section 13 of the Constitution, and the Division Chairperson's Attestation, it is hereby certified that the conclusions in the above decision were reached in consultation before the case was assigned to the writer of the opinion of the Court.In addition to acts or omissions of public officers already penalized by existing law, the following shall constitute corrupt practices of any public officer and are hereby declared to be unlawful: xxxf) Neglecting or refusing, after due demand or request, without sufficient justification, to act within a reasonable time on any matter pending before him for the purpose of obtaining, directly or indirectly, from any person interested in the matter some pecuniary or material benefit or advantage, or for the purpose of favoring his own interest or giving undue advantage in favor of or discriminating against any other interested party.Under the contract of carriage the shipper is entitled to demand that the bill of lading be dated correctly.If the Master or another agent of the carrier negligently misdates the bill, the carrier as principal is liable in damages if the shipper has suffered a loss as a result of the misdating.An archaeologist can determine the age of a pottery fragment by measuring the remaining amount of radioactive elements that it contains.
Using both relative and absolute dating methods, an archaeologist can often place a site within a larger chronological framework.
Ginez-Jabalde of the Office of the Ombudsman, recommending the dismissal of the charges filed by the petitioner against Secretary Lina B. Ginez-Jabalde in his assailed Resolution dated This means that he had already disposed the case by having at that time a prepared resolution and the contents of the same had already been fed to the respondents computer for printing and for subsequent release.
Laigo of the DSWD; Memorandum dated November 20, 1997, issued by Special Prosecution Officer III Carlos D. 95-224, filed an administrative complaint against SSP Barrios charging the latter with dishonesty, gross negligence and incompetence. 7610, was filed against the petitioner and her sister Oliva Angeles, by Rebecca Pacay, a former helper of the petitioner. Complainant Judges assertion of ante-dating to conceal connivance is entirely baseless because nobody could know at that time to whom the case would be assigned in the event the inhibition and disqualification will be granted.
By this special civil action for certiorari and mandamus under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court, petitioner Adoracion G. As correctly pointed out by the Ombudsman in the challenged Order dated The coordination and monitoring on the cases against the complainant Judge (petitioner) made by the respondent Secretary should not be interpreted as pure interference on the job of the state prosecutors.
Angeles seeks the annulment and setting aside of the following issuances in connection with OMB-0-97-0047, a proceeding instituted by the petitioner with the Office of the Ombudsman against the respondents (DSWD) Secretary Lina B. 96-258 was indorsed by the Quezon City Prosecutor to the Office of the Chief State Prosecutor, DOJ, because of its similarity with I. Their constant exposure to the trauma of court litigation are the necessary consequences of their decision to file a complaint against Judge Adoracion G. Neither does the alleged similarity existing between the resolution prepared by respondent Barrios and the Joint Resolution prepared by respondents Fadullon and Agcaoili indicate conspiracy.
The 1885 coin in Layer E establishes that Layer E dates from on or after 1885.